From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 097893971C36; Fri,  1 May 2020 18:00:07 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 097893971C36
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1588356007;
 bh=MDVi4Sautehaow2Ey9k3tzPRLn9nzjo6OqEegofg5dc=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=DOHPRrvF8g3MTV9k+TDkcB2tn68o6M6d1GW7mIk3NKMl8LR05C3C7ZmxMNFTPaeEM
 bpYGJBZqjW/onARiJqzYYMJYD14IGOi/1tavbRe+cMgvxw1qSg3TN+hS/ZqajAl9jw
 pwpc/9rBxyiFyqIVnasrY0qPEXz7Cgy2nkm9WpH0=
From: "msebor at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/90036] [8/9/10/11 Regression] false positive: directive
 argument is null [-Werror=format-overflow=]
Date: Fri, 01 May 2020 18:00:06 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.3.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: deferred, diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-90036-4-3KMda5qtS1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-90036-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-90036-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 May 2020 18:00:07 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D90036

--- Comment #10 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The warning for the test in comment #3 has disappeared in GCC 10 (it's still
there in GCC 9).  There are no printf calls with null arguments in the strl=
en
dump.

GCC 10 still issues a warning for the test in comment #8.  The predicate
analysis might be something to look into for GCC 11.=