From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id ED11D3858D37; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 05:16:38 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org ED11D3858D37
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1708492598;
	bh=8fdNksPRf+YH1BF++dNok/6IsXwzkdKk+KoQmtbcQ3U=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=kB+cUD/q9epQbQRMjP5XKLxB0d8KRWl5+0LKcMo1+eclW3TC25kcK4Zgm1CBGBbTd
	 Qyu3uFv5D/nGZRW6UTez6IBdq3ww4BjFhpCsuYOLYJjozkkyO+zNDDS7vinp4i3FFF
	 YI5M+evKwq0K1txcEXckoJSh10p+TKt4OAfSLznY=
From: "sjames at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/90204] [11/12/13/14 Regression] C code is optimized
 worse than C++
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 05:16:38 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, needs-bisection
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-90204-4-WpV3ClS4mC@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-90204-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-90204-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D90204

Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #22 from Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
r12-5390-gd3152981f71eef (Reduce cost of aligned sse register store.) seems=
 to
be the fix.=