* [Bug c++/90212] [8/9/10/11 Regression] by-ref capture of constexpr class object rejected
[not found] <bug-90212-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2020-04-30 20:01 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-05 21:40 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jason at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-04-30 20:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90212
Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/90212] [8/9/10/11 Regression] by-ref capture of constexpr class object rejected
[not found] <bug-90212-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-04-30 20:01 ` [Bug c++/90212] [8/9/10/11 Regression] by-ref capture of constexpr class object rejected jason at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-05-05 21:40 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-25 22:06 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-05-05 21:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90212
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill <jason@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:04b89192ace3a766a17374d5bef8fb19d9be2d7c
commit r11-122-g04b89192ace3a766a17374d5bef8fb19d9be2d7c
Author: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Date: Tue May 5 17:39:19 2020 -0400
c++: constexpr and lambda capture [PR90212]
This is the same issue as PR86429, just in potential_constant_expression_1
rather than cxx_eval_constant_expression. As in that case, when we're
trying to evaluate a constant expression within a lambda, we don't have a
constant closure object to refer to, but we can try to refer directly to
the
captured variable.
gcc/cp/ChangeLog
2020-05-05 Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
PR c++/90212
* constexpr.c (potential_constant_expression_1): In a lambda
function, consider a captured variable directly.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/90212] [8/9/10/11 Regression] by-ref capture of constexpr class object rejected
[not found] <bug-90212-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-04-30 20:01 ` [Bug c++/90212] [8/9/10/11 Regression] by-ref capture of constexpr class object rejected jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-05 21:40 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-05-25 22:06 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-25 22:38 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-05-25 22:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90212
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
<jason@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aa613a81831bdc044840a95a7a7803a235608503
commit r10-8183-gaa613a81831bdc044840a95a7a7803a235608503
Author: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Date: Mon May 25 18:04:39 2020 -0400
c++: constexpr and lambda capture [PR90212]
This is the same issue as PR86429, just in potential_constant_expression_1
rather than cxx_eval_constant_expression. As in that case, when we're
trying to evaluate a constant expression within a lambda, we don't have a
constant closure object to refer to, but we can try to refer directly to
the
captured variable.
gcc/cp/ChangeLog
2020-05-05 Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
PR c++/90212
* constexpr.c (potential_constant_expression_1): In a lambda
function, consider a captured variable directly.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/90212] [8/9/10/11 Regression] by-ref capture of constexpr class object rejected
[not found] <bug-90212-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-05-25 22:06 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-05-25 22:38 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-25 22:49 ` [Bug c++/90212] [8 " jason at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-05-25 22:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90212
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
<jason@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0296697cf9893dc9509cdcd8e3fd4ba9fe422527
commit r9-8623-g0296697cf9893dc9509cdcd8e3fd4ba9fe422527
Author: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Date: Mon May 25 18:38:09 2020 -0400
c++: constexpr and lambda capture [PR90212]
This is the same issue as PR86429, just in potential_constant_expression_1
rather than cxx_eval_constant_expression. As in that case, when we're
trying to evaluate a constant expression within a lambda, we don't have a
constant closure object to refer to, but we can try to refer directly to
the
captured variable.
gcc/cp/ChangeLog
2020-05-05 Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
PR c++/90212
* constexpr.c (potential_constant_expression_1): In a lambda
function, consider a captured variable directly.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/90212] [8 Regression] by-ref capture of constexpr class object rejected
[not found] <bug-90212-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2020-05-25 22:38 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-05-25 22:49 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-26 6:56 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jason at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-05-25 22:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90212
Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] |[8 Regression] by-ref
|by-ref capture of constexpr |capture of constexpr class
|class object rejected |object rejected
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed for 9.4/10.2/11. Is this important to fix in GCC 8?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/90212] [8 Regression] by-ref capture of constexpr class object rejected
[not found] <bug-90212-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2020-05-25 22:49 ` [Bug c++/90212] [8 " jason at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-05-26 6:56 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-26 6:57 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-14 13:06 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-05-26 6:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90212
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Not important for me. I don't remember where the yesterday came from.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/90212] [8 Regression] by-ref capture of constexpr class object rejected
[not found] <bug-90212-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2020-05-26 6:56 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-05-26 6:57 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-14 13:06 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-05-26 6:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90212
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Oops, autocorrect.
s/yesterday/testcase/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/90212] [8 Regression] by-ref capture of constexpr class object rejected
[not found] <bug-90212-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2020-05-26 6:57 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-05-14 13:06 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-05-14 13:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90212
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|8.5 |9.4
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The GCC 8 branch is being closed, fixed in GCC 9.4.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread