* [Bug rtl-optimization/90249] [9/10 Regression] Code size regression on thumb2 due to sub-optimal register allocation starting with r265398
[not found] <bug-90249-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2020-03-12 11:58 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-25 14:40 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/90249] [9/10/11 " stammark at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-03-12 11:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90249
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 9.3.0 has been released, adjusting target milestone.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug rtl-optimization/90249] [9/10/11 Regression] Code size regression on thumb2 due to sub-optimal register allocation starting with r265398
[not found] <bug-90249-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-03-12 11:58 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/90249] [9/10 Regression] Code size regression on thumb2 due to sub-optimal register allocation starting with r265398 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-11-25 14:40 ` stammark at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-25 14:42 ` stammark at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: stammark at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-11-25 14:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90249
Stam Markianos-Wright <stammark at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |stammark at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |stammark at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #12 from Stam Markianos-Wright <stammark at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Was reminded that this was still open after many months. Have fixed the commit
and am in the process of backporting to gcc-8,9.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug rtl-optimization/90249] [9/10/11 Regression] Code size regression on thumb2 due to sub-optimal register allocation starting with r265398
[not found] <bug-90249-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-03-12 11:58 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/90249] [9/10 Regression] Code size regression on thumb2 due to sub-optimal register allocation starting with r265398 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-25 14:40 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/90249] [9/10/11 " stammark at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-11-25 14:42 ` stammark at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-25 14:43 ` stammark at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: stammark at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-11-25 14:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90249
Stam Markianos-Wright <stammark at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|stammark at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #13 from Stam Markianos-Wright <stammark at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Was reminded that this was still open after many months. Have fixed the commit
and am in the process of backporting to gcc-8,9.(In reply to Stam
Markianos-Wright from comment #12)
> Was reminded that this was still open after many months. Have fixed the
> commit and am in the process of backporting to gcc-8,9.
Excuse that, am an idiot and commented in entirely the wrong place!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug rtl-optimization/90249] [9/10/11 Regression] Code size regression on thumb2 due to sub-optimal register allocation starting with r265398
[not found] <bug-90249-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-11-25 14:42 ` stammark at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-11-25 14:43 ` stammark at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-01 8:13 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/90249] [9/10/11/12 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: stammark at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-11-25 14:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90249
--- Comment #14 from Stam Markianos-Wright <stammark at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Was reminded that this was still open after many months. Have fixed the commit
and am in the process of backporting to gcc-8,9.(In reply to Stam
Markianos-Wright from comment #12)
> Was reminded that this was still open after many months. Have fixed the
> commit and am in the process of backporting to gcc-8,9.
Excuse that, am an idiot and commented in entirely the wrong place!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug rtl-optimization/90249] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Code size regression on thumb2 due to sub-optimal register allocation starting with r265398
[not found] <bug-90249-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2020-11-25 14:43 ` stammark at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-06-01 8:13 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-27 9:40 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/90249] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-06-01 8:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90249
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|9.4 |9.5
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 9.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 9.5.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug rtl-optimization/90249] [10/11/12/13 Regression] Code size regression on thumb2 due to sub-optimal register allocation starting with r265398
[not found] <bug-90249-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2021-06-01 8:13 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/90249] [9/10/11/12 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-05-27 9:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 10:37 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:35 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/90249] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-05-27 9:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90249
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|9.5 |10.4
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 9 branch is being closed
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug rtl-optimization/90249] [10/11/12/13 Regression] Code size regression on thumb2 due to sub-optimal register allocation starting with r265398
[not found] <bug-90249-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2022-05-27 9:40 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/90249] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-06-28 10:37 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:35 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/90249] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-06-28 10:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90249
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.4 |10.5
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 10.5.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug rtl-optimization/90249] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Code size regression on thumb2 due to sub-optimal register allocation starting with r265398
[not found] <bug-90249-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2022-06-28 10:37 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-07-07 10:35 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-07-07 10:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90249
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.5 |11.5
--- Comment #18 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10 branch is being closed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread