From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 1785438708E3; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 16:58:53 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1785438708E3
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1597424334;
 bh=KnKxhuDHQlOX5jeUtsuiiNBsft785hGIRDPvj6uLhm8=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=DgAaeW0PxdDFjPi6bNobGHWxFA0qdy/sKyEV1KQwBw8DIpjRuLAg1ywXe7IjejLEp
 PAR5LrYQRFaWCIxofouetkWYiuVPSGsBa4czpBXwibeLFQS2MfFqG6Im/PfqOeJ0l4
 y2N70pzDKz6g1/qpxBpP9coOeiURxnoQvjnoEkkI=
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/90254] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ice on aggregate
 initialization of unmovable base
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 16:58:53 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.3.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code, ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jason at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 8.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-90254-4-Su7jIxhJmU@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-90254-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-90254-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 16:58:54 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D90254

--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill <jason@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:320054784250e572cb75d6f69ab44b2330d61d8b

commit r11-2704-g320054784250e572cb75d6f69ab44b2330d61d8b
Author: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed Aug 12 05:45:02 2020 -0400

    c++: Copy elision and [[no_unique_address]]. [PR93711]

    We don't elide a copy from a function returning a class by value into a
base
    because that can overwrite data laid out in the tail padding of the base
    class; we need to handle [[no_unique_address]] fields the same way, or =
we
    ICE when the middle-end wants to create a temporary object of a
    TYPE_NEEDS_CONSTRUCTING type.

    This means that we can't always express initialization of a field with
    INIT_EXPR from a TARGET_EXPR the way we usually do, so I needed
    to change several places that were assuming that was sufficient.

    This also fixes 90254, the same problem with C++17 aggregate initializa=
tion
    of a base.

    gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

            PR c++/90254
            PR c++/93711
            * cp-tree.h (unsafe_return_slot_p): Declare.
            * call.c (is_base_field_ref): Rename to unsafe_return_slot_p.
            (build_over_call): Check unsafe_return_slot_p.
            (build_special_member_call): Likewise.
            * init.c (expand_default_init): Likewise.
            * typeck2.c (split_nonconstant_init_1): Likewise.

    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

            PR c++/90254
            PR c++/93711
            * g++.dg/cpp1z/aggr-base10.C: New test.
            * g++.dg/cpp2a/no_unique_address7.C: New test.
            * g++.dg/cpp2a/no_unique_address7a.C: New test.=