From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 345B7386EC76; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 17:01:48 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 345B7386EC76
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1597424508;
 bh=AHdi2xYOkT880Cwt5bXwNWiJvSXHhRXewB3lma2eXA4=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=ihwkQw/tNq4Lv3bk9117joSqqywgripV0TLXGxwLqhH5meJ63DSJTO+t0mwf3/OnL
 LwCsysLiYphIut2hSOiI9uFg+esL9cACtrZ6L9HO4o/prRzlP7KdwGhPJ3aFZS/QjE
 UmDCieMdrWSlH92N7pnH+2eDPZ0LUOQE/Lj4sIKc=
From: "jason at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/90254] [8/9/10 Regression] ice on aggregate initialization
 of unmovable base
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 17:01:47 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.3.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code, ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jason at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jason at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 8.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: short_desc
Message-ID: <bug-90254-4-fQbhBSXCa0@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-90254-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-90254-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 17:01:48 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D90254

Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] ice  |[8/9/10 Regression] ice on
                   |on aggregate initialization |aggregate initialization of
                   |of unmovable base           |unmovable base

--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The patch fixes the testcase from comment #4 for GCC 11.  I agree with the
clang response that the original testcase is ill-formed, and will continue =
to
be rejected.  The testcase in comment #3 is still broken due to PR 66139.=