From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 532793856DD0; Wed, 19 Jul 2023 11:37:42 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 532793856DD0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1689766662; bh=DxCsFmwoms6PZzyJ576YmAIpPpfPoiJ6MFxzadluRaw=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=NosULm5lwapIz4V1bCEX3mxloQTvUhy/lDFBqEhWbFn3NqB5pOIUAcvNyTnaGvWxD yIVRNxDa0hJUmlbLSnK2pEsY1clP19ZmyHXcejnPpfPOIIg/Dgfws++ADXwAj4QLQ7 0H8o76I9emELmYnlBHBWvoUNkwhKnMdscuJuT2QE= From: "rguenther at suse dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/90348] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Partition of char arrays is incorrect in some cases Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 11:37:42 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.3.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenther at suse dot de X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D90348 --- Comment #30 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 19 Jul 2023, gnu.ojxq8 at dralias dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D90348 >=20 > maic changed: >=20 > What |Removed |Added > -------------------------------------------------------------------------= --- > CC| |gnu.ojxq8 at dralias dot= com >=20 > --- Comment #29 from maic --- > > GCC 11 branch but no longer with GCC 12+ >=20 > So is this fixed and can be closed? (Also, the title could be edited then= to > remove gcc 12-14) No it's not fixed, just the testcase doesn't expose the issue anymore.=