From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 12BD33858C53; Tue, 9 May 2023 11:06:48 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 12BD33858C53 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1683630408; bh=tkBFtY3nB/jkRw1D/TLrCsnmiSjUYo2mfrbpS8kqGqk=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=p7YgdDslKx9YdzuNuXedgiLUDSQurhNTODWu+qS8bb+Cc+LE1l+1nJ/2COu0U4UQs q9M5Ew+Gpw9cG3DxIay8yDryVZzpnaW9uQbSK9jT47QE9KqWh38rPDDOc+BZMrxOLD aMROyqs40yQbj4sI65O4EiBSEccdiQJg+NDRAv7Q= From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/90348] [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] Partition of char arrays is incorrect in some cases Date: Tue, 09 May 2023 11:06:45 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.3.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D90348 --- Comment #27 from Richard Biener --- The testcase in comment#2 still reproduces on the GCC 11 branch but no long= er with GCC 12+ (on x86_64-linux, -O2).=