public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug driver/90392] [9/10 Regression] Assertion failure in ldlang.c:6868 when compiling with -flto
[not found] <bug-90392-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2020-03-12 11:59 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-04-01 8:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-03-12 11:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90392
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 9.3.0 has been released, adjusting target milestone.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug driver/90392] [9/10 Regression] Assertion failure in ldlang.c:6868 when compiling with -flto
[not found] <bug-90392-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-03-12 11:59 ` [Bug driver/90392] [9/10 Regression] Assertion failure in ldlang.c:6868 when compiling with -flto jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-04-01 8:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-04-01 11:14 ` ohaiziejohwahkeezuoz at xff dot cz
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-04-01 8:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90392
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed| |2020-04-01
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Unsure what the remaining driver issue is - an actual testcase with a
smaller command-line should be able to show this more clearly?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug driver/90392] [9/10 Regression] Assertion failure in ldlang.c:6868 when compiling with -flto
[not found] <bug-90392-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-03-12 11:59 ` [Bug driver/90392] [9/10 Regression] Assertion failure in ldlang.c:6868 when compiling with -flto jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-04-01 8:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-04-01 11:14 ` ohaiziejohwahkeezuoz at xff dot cz
2020-04-17 15:55 ` [Bug driver/90392] [8/9/10 " law at redhat dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: ohaiziejohwahkeezuoz at xff dot cz @ 2020-04-01 11:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90392
--- Comment #11 from ohaiziejohwahkeezuoz at xff dot cz ---
Try this:
touch a.a a.o
gcc -save-temps -Wl,-debug -o a a.o a.a -ldl
Outputs:
...
/usr/bin/ld -plugin /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/9.3.0/liblto_plugin.so
-plugin-opt=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/9.3.0/lto-wrapper
-plugin-opt=-fresolution=-ldl.res -plugin-opt=-pass-through=-lgcc
-plugin-opt=-pass-through=-lgcc_s -plugin-opt=-pass-through=-lc
-plugin-opt=-pass-through=-lgcc -plugin-opt=-pass-through=-lgcc_s --build-id
--eh-frame-hdr --hash-style=gnu -m elf_x86_64 -dynamic-linker
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 -pie -o a
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/9.3.0/../../../../lib/Scrt1.o
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/9.3.0/../../../../lib/crti.o
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/9.3.0/crtbeginS.o
-L/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/9.3.0
-L/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/9.3.0/../../../../lib -L/lib/../lib
-L/usr/lib/../lib -L/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/9.3.0/../../.. a.o a.a
-ldl -lgcc --push-state --as-needed -lgcc_s --pop-state -lc -lgcc --push-state
--as-needed -lgcc_s --pop-state
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/9.3.0/crtendS.o
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/9.3.0/../../../../lib/crtn.o
/usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/9.3.0/../../../../lib/Scrt1.o: in
function `_start':
(.text+0x24): undefined reference to `main'
Notice the: ... -plugin-opt=-fresolution=-ldl.res ...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug driver/90392] [8/9/10 Regression] Assertion failure in ldlang.c:6868 when compiling with -flto
[not found] <bug-90392-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-04-01 11:14 ` ohaiziejohwahkeezuoz at xff dot cz
@ 2020-04-17 15:55 ` law at redhat dot com
2020-04-17 17:43 ` [Bug driver/90392] Bogus value for %u in LINK_PLUGIN_SPEC law at redhat dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: law at redhat dot com @ 2020-04-17 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90392
Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[9/10 Regression] Assertion |[8/9/10 Regression]
|failure in ldlang.c:6868 |Assertion failure in
|when compiling with -flto |ldlang.c:6868 when
| |compiling with -flto
CC| |law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #12 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> ---
GCC 8 also affected. Digging further back, but starting to wonder if the %u
issue is a regression or not.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug driver/90392] Bogus value for %u in LINK_PLUGIN_SPEC
[not found] <bug-90392-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2020-04-17 15:55 ` [Bug driver/90392] [8/9/10 " law at redhat dot com
@ 2020-04-17 17:43 ` law at redhat dot com
2021-06-01 8:14 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-27 8:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: law at redhat dot com @ 2020-04-17 17:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90392
Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |NEW
Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] |Bogus value for %u in
|Assertion failure in |LINK_PLUGIN_SPEC
|ldlang.c:6868 when |
|compiling with -flto |
--- Comment #13 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> ---
Updating summary, dropping regression marker. Behavior seen as far back as
gcc-6, probably started before then. Given the dl.res has been consistent,
it's most likely not memory corruption -- if it were memory corruption I'd
expect to see different results over time rather than the consistent "dl.res"
output for %u.res.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug driver/90392] Bogus value for %u in LINK_PLUGIN_SPEC
[not found] <bug-90392-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2020-04-17 17:43 ` [Bug driver/90392] Bogus value for %u in LINK_PLUGIN_SPEC law at redhat dot com
@ 2021-06-01 8:14 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-27 8:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-06-01 8:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90392
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|9.4 |9.5
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 9.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 9.5.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug driver/90392] Bogus value for %u in LINK_PLUGIN_SPEC
[not found] <bug-90392-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2021-06-01 8:14 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-05-27 8:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-05-27 8:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90392
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|9.5 |---
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-05-27 8:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-90392-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-03-12 11:59 ` [Bug driver/90392] [9/10 Regression] Assertion failure in ldlang.c:6868 when compiling with -flto jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-04-01 8:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-04-01 11:14 ` ohaiziejohwahkeezuoz at xff dot cz
2020-04-17 15:55 ` [Bug driver/90392] [8/9/10 " law at redhat dot com
2020-04-17 17:43 ` [Bug driver/90392] Bogus value for %u in LINK_PLUGIN_SPEC law at redhat dot com
2021-06-01 8:14 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-27 8:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).