* [Bug target/90524] [10/11/12 Regression] attribute name and argument mixed up in an error message
[not found] <bug-90524-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2021-12-20 3:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-20 3:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-12-20 3:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90524
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|attribute name and argument |[10/11/12 Regression]
|mixed up in an error |attribute name and argument
|message |mixed up in an error
| |message
Last reconfirmed|2019-05-17 00:00:00 |2021-12-19
Known to work| |9.4.0
Target Milestone|--- |10.4
Known to fail| |10.1.0
Version|9.0 |10.0
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Before GCC 10, GCC would produce:
<source>:2:1: error: attribute(target("foobar")) is unknown
2 | __attribute__ ((target ("foobar"))) void foo () { }
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
Which I think is reasonable.
So this is a regression from GCC 9.4.0.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug target/90524] [10/11/12 Regression] attribute name and argument mixed up in an error message
[not found] <bug-90524-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2021-12-20 3:40 ` [Bug target/90524] [10/11/12 Regression] attribute name and argument mixed up in an error message pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-12-20 3:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-20 3:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-12-20 3:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90524
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target| |x86_64-linux-gnu
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
aarch64 error message is good:
<source>:2:1: error: pragma or attribute 'target("foobar")' is not valid
2 | __attribute__ ((target ("foobar"))) void foo () { }
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug target/90524] [10/11/12 Regression] attribute name and argument mixed up in an error message
[not found] <bug-90524-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2021-12-20 3:40 ` [Bug target/90524] [10/11/12 Regression] attribute name and argument mixed up in an error message pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-20 3:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-12-20 3:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-21 13:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-12-20 3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90524
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> aarch64 error message is good:
> <source>:2:1: error: pragma or attribute 'target("foobar")' is not valid
> 2 | __attribute__ ((target ("foobar"))) void foo () { }
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
arm is decent too:
<source>:2:1: error: unknown target attribute or pragma 'foobar'
2 | __attribute__ ((target ("foobar"))) void foo () { }
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
Though I do think these diagnostic should be uniform rather than have formats.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug target/90524] [10/11/12 Regression] attribute name and argument mixed up in an error message
[not found] <bug-90524-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2021-12-20 3:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-01-21 13:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-03 17:24 ` [Bug target/90524] [10/11 " msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-01-21 13:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90524
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug target/90524] [10/11 Regression] attribute name and argument mixed up in an error message
[not found] <bug-90524-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2022-01-21 13:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-02-03 17:24 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-07 9:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-02-03 17:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90524
Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |NEW
Summary|[10/11/12 Regression] |[10/11 Regression]
|attribute name and argument |attribute name and argument
|mixed up in an error |mixed up in an error
|message |message
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed by Martin Liska in r12-7014. I'll leave that to others to backport.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug target/90524] [10/11 Regression] attribute name and argument mixed up in an error message
[not found] <bug-90524-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2022-02-03 17:24 ` [Bug target/90524] [10/11 " msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-04-07 9:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-07 10:41 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-07 10:44 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-04-07 9:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90524
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
You fixed this appearantly, maybe you want to backport it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug target/90524] [10/11 Regression] attribute name and argument mixed up in an error message
[not found] <bug-90524-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2022-04-07 9:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-04-07 10:41 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-07 10:44 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-04-07 10:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90524
Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
No, I don't want to backport it, it's not so important.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug target/90524] [10/11 Regression] attribute name and argument mixed up in an error message
[not found] <bug-90524-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2022-04-07 10:41 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-04-07 10:44 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-04-07 10:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90524
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.4 |12.0
Known to work| |12.0
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread