From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id B43D13858D33; Mon, 16 Oct 2023 10:30:20 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B43D13858D33 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1697452220; bh=LVejNHNcvEUwA5CDJUcxb97R7+BA0tphK7Blbdnup7w=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=iNlZJShg8WJLGMHhTZSOW1Pq4OuvP+zctZvAcgxhLTyJIhKbHNdEF8rUJvHB/MnP1 UdHwXM6RXKwZY39IlO8ExyKbIJ/eC7BFLKZv0ZWNga8pSoAJ8lRKJF/fgA2nFOG/T2 X9+yIBwyT9PxHfLoBrZy5Q1dv80tgO4T25a/sIPA= From: "tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/90608] Inline non-scalar minloc/maxloc calls Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 10:30:19 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D90608 --- Comment #12 from Tamar Christina --- (In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #11) > Created attachment 56094 [details] > Improved patch >=20 > This improved patch (still single argument only) passes the fortran > regression testsuite. >=20 Awesome! Thanks! it looks like the benchmark always uses dim=3D1 or the mask argument. Can you give a hint into what I'd need to do to add the additional params?=