From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id B93C3384BC14; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 17:05:37 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B93C3384BC14 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1594832737; bh=hvFkB/+RMyYsXhNlKTwLXbj+E0celiP7F8WQtfzV920=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=xooBXV+t2Bzgkxz6CaX24xDRFpLdDgIUXQVgajQDnl64x2Y7okJosCb0DAZiaNb8w J8UPIaxCq/mkSZh3fo+z8bd/2bjRXPdxyBQ4Zmrqs7wViq0cOExcIpIo8WOhQZSovl GAIi/8bMBZdqyl5U3Lk3mWfi2+28nESR5CKpNL/8= From: "ofv at wanadoo dot es" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/90664] [7/8 regression] noexcept confuses template argument deduction Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 17:05:37 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid, wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ofv at wanadoo dot es X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: short_desc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 17:05:37 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D90664 ofv at wanadoo dot es changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|noexcept confuses template |[7/8 regression] noexcept |argument deduction |confuses template argument | |deduction --- Comment #2 from ofv at wanadoo dot es --- The upcoming gcc 11 still shows this problem. I edited the bug title to indicate that it is a regression.=