public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/90679] Template specialization with const: “ambiguous template instantiation” error Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 16:40:52 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-90679-4-OIgbFpKSJy@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-90679-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90679 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka <ppalka@gcc.gnu.org>: https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0a37463758dabc9647fa3d675dffdf43a737035d commit r14-6715-g0a37463758dabc9647fa3d675dffdf43a737035d Author: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com> Date: Tue Dec 19 11:40:15 2023 -0500 c++: partial ordering and dep alias tmpl specs [PR90679] During partial ordering, we want to look through dependent alias template specializations within template arguments and otherwise treat them as opaque in other contexts (see e.g. r7-7116-g0c942f3edab108 and r11-7011-g6e0a231a4aa240). To that end template_args_equal was given a partial_order flag that controls this behavior. This flag does the right thing when a dependent alias template specialization appears as template argument of the partial specialization, e.g. in template<class T, class...> using first_t = T; template<class T> struct traits; template<class T> struct traits<first_t<T, T&>> { }; // #1 template<class T> struct traits<first_t<const T, T&>> { }; // #2 we correctly consider #2 to be more specialized than #1. But if the alias specialization appears as a nested template argument of another class template specialization, e.g. in template<class T> struct traits<A<first_t<T, T&>>> { }; // #1 template<class T> struct traits<A<first_t<const T, T&>>> { }; // #2 then we incorrectly consider #1 and #2 to be unordered. This is because 1. we don't propagate the flag to recursive template_args_equal calls 2. we don't use structural equality for class template specializations written in terms of dependent alias template specializations This patch fixes the first issue by turning the partial_order flag into a global. This patch fixes the second issue by making us propagate structural equality appropriately when building a class template specialization. In passing this patch also improves hashing of specializations that use structural equality. PR c++/90679 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * cp-tree.h (comp_template_args): Remove partial_order parameter. (template_args_equal): Likewise. * pt.cc (comparing_for_partial_ordering): New global flag. (iterative_hash_template_arg) <case tcc_type>: Hash the template and arguments for specializations that use structural equality. (template_args_equal): Remove partial order parameter and use comparing_for_partial_ordering instead. (comp_template_args): Likewise. (comp_template_args_porder): Set comparing_for_partial_ordering instead. Make static. (any_template_arguments_need_structural_equality_p): Return true for an argument that's a dependent alias template specialization or a class template specialization that itself needs structural equality. * tree.cc (cp_tree_equal) <case TREE_VEC>: Adjust call to comp_template_args. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-75a.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-75b.C: New test.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-19 16:40 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top [not found] <bug-90679-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2023-12-19 16:40 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-12-19 16:40 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2023-12-19 16:43 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-90679-4-OIgbFpKSJy@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).