From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id E2D783858431; Mon, 20 Nov 2023 17:01:59 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E2D783858431 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1700499719; bh=yHrJHT1eZP2+ZNwTuKNwhNUVfmzeyu0Ksk2zd8rvcqM=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=FrQUDIAp4gLDBMo4U40KO/++0D1zEwI17xsER7FqQHUZbKpV4Tgd0va2EjU1BiZUK tDHRRJjMNgM2oXx4O8GI92devPNStlhwWpN0peAWgFE6BnIoMuws9qFC9pg7HgijnA QUFfhjjBZv8YyX5O89GvLZrqOKYRTvZSY1tC/tdg= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/90693] Missing popcount simplifications Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2023 17:01:58 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: wilco at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D90693 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- I guess now the important question is if what we produce with the patch is faster (or at least not slower) than what we used to generate on all target= s; though, if that isn't the case, best fix might be to adjust target costs.=