public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "gjl at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/90706] [10/11/12/13 Regression] Useless code generated for stack / register operations on AVR
Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2023 13:45:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-90706-4-dxZ0ZJtIXm@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-90706-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90706

Georg-Johann Lay <gjl at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Known to work|                            |8.5.0

--- Comment #19 from Georg-Johann Lay <gjl at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to CVS Commits from comment #18)
> https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2639f9d2313664e6b4ed2f8131fefa60aeeb0518
> 
> commit r13-6424-g2639f9d2313664e6b4ed2f8131fefa60aeeb0518
> Author: Vladimir N. Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com>
> Date:   Thu Mar 2 16:29:05 2023 -0500
> 
>     IRA: Use minimal cost for hard register movement

Thank you; the code looks clean now. (For my test case from comment #16 I
needed -fno-split wide-types which is a different story).

Is there any chance your fix will be back-ported?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-03-04 13:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-90706-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-03-12 11:59 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/90706] [9/10 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-03-13 23:25 ` bseifert at gmx dot at
2020-04-29 16:50 ` gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-01  8:14 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/90706] [9/10/11/12 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-27  9:40 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/90706] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 10:37 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-01 15:55 ` gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-13 14:10 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-15 19:20 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-16 13:59 ` gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-16 18:33 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-02 22:22 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-04 13:45 ` gjl at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2023-03-31 12:42 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-31 12:45 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-31 14:38 ` gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-21 15:25 ` gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-05 19:28 ` gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-18  8:15 ` gjl at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-90706-4-dxZ0ZJtIXm@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).