From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 12D24385E00E; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 20:36:51 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 12D24385E00E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1585427811; bh=DOQ0ZUy614oq9i/LgwVqZ7RK07kuxCats9PAerSsIiM=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=YCA11xgAhkRx+sDROawd8ueS48tqEu4aL6Q8EwyDx9j+nueB+03Xqp7WRJXTx0iKL 7q1ZAtefc06Bb6r+LgfGtveXaUt4A3CPJzun1FoSMEZu2ShzPN+LUniapUBFRcmmdR Xt4LBYXZh5gbeYIJwUaypubjiAkKNds1ENnSISbM= From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/90794] [8/9/10 Regression] -O3 with "VLA type" in C++ leads to an ICE Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 20:36:50 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 8.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 20:36:51 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D90794 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Nicholas Krause from comment #6) > I can confirm about building trunk from yesterday that this code no longer > ICEs on 03. Can someone please close this bug as it no longer blocks C++ = VLA > for gcc 10. No, because it still crashes on today's master. And even if it didn't, it's= a regression on the gcc-8 and gcc-9 branches so it needs to be fixed on those branches before it can be closed.=