From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id C1C8D3851C32; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 22:00:44 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C1C8D3851C32 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1588111244; bh=Y48MtOR8Tdc7UmpfWA7/5Kx3HdhPuI925Yg5Tj/HzvI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=tfJqrDPgW/+83PSOst/VNN8kKYorj+2wu1DKFT3wFYo00py5Dy8NqQ0ULRJ7w7oOV jtWHK6qWNR0fFKRIB2FoxREvXbNPOMoa2CmsTfZb9mPDYAH85E3BmsFzNswA0W4weK MmqZTMVthOfSvi7F8gK2nxM3Vr/kt8h7Okpxi5zg= From: "jason at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/90992] [9/10 Regression] -Wnoexcept produce false positive Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 22:00:44 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jason at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jason at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 22:00:44 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D90992 Jason Merrill changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|9.4 |10.0 Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #14 from Jason Merrill --- Since no other testcase has appeared, I'm calling this fixed in GCC 10.=