public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/91212] [8/9/10/11 Regression] const ignored for ctor arguments within return since r8-2493-g4ce8c5dea53d8073 Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 18:25:23 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-91212-4-1eHLrk1ZSQ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-91212-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91212 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill <jason@gcc.gnu.org>: https://gcc.gnu.org/g:81bc0ec3e926d7a2c90502847ddaacf3d56d5b75 commit r11-2411-g81bc0ec3e926d7a2c90502847ddaacf3d56d5b75 Author: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> Date: Wed Jul 29 00:57:40 2020 -0400 c++: Avoid calling const copy ctor on implicit move. [PR91212] Our implementation of C++11 implicit move was wrong for return; we didn't actually hit the check for the type of the first parameter of the selected constructor, because we didn't see LOOKUP_PREFER_RVALUE set properly. Fixing that to look at the right flags fixed the issue for this testcase, but broke implicit move for a by-value converting constructor (PR58051). I think this was not allowed in C++17, but it is allowed under the implicit move changes from C++20, and those changes were voted to apply as a DR to earlier standards as well, so I don't want to break it now. So after fixing the flags check I changed the test to allow value parameters. gcc/cp/ChangeLog: PR c++/91212 * call.c (build_over_call): Don't call a const ref overload for implicit move. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR c++/91212 * g++.dg/cpp0x/move-return3.C: New test.
next parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-29 18:25 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top [not found] <bug-91212-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2020-07-29 18:25 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2020-09-27 23:37 ` blubban at gmail dot com 2021-05-14 9:51 ` [Bug c++/91212] [9/10 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-06-01 8:14 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-05-27 9:41 ` [Bug c++/91212] [10 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-06-28 10:38 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-03-07 17:43 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-91212-4-1eHLrk1ZSQ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).