From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 8A88F3858D32; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 01:20:05 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8A88F3858D32 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1677547205; bh=a53LjQ4hEv14PBu60yAbq6CbnovlKn6ExvELsYH0cZs=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=GeiNt4UAwh0wUxuWPK5S1N96cgfoarekV687HGqfbRjsbVp5in9hckqhfLAhgFdxb A6iHo2CfMAgJbrFPB+6iBqXavn7STzaUgPKXLZtSYZszsxupURwFlBQ99FUO7xA74R ZasEYHGPt5dhU2WO2465KaAE91mevlxkUXPPk2k8= From: "hp at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug testsuite/91419] [10 Regression]: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr91091-2.c, ssa-fre-61.c, ssa-fre-61.c with r273232 Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 01:20:02 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: hp at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D91419 --- Comment #7 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- Oops, the second xfail for gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr91091-2.c is wrong and I never noticed the xpass at the time. Same for pru-elf and m68k-linux. Will comm= it an update; a revert of that line (of the commit from 2019, see log above).=