From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 19BEC385DC27; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 08:24:51 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 19BEC385DC27
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/91602] GCC fails to build for riscv in a combined tree
 due to misconfigured leb128 support
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 08:24:50 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: belyshev at depni dot sinp.msu.ru
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-91602-4-R1pWwPFMlv@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-91602-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-91602-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 08:24:51 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D91602

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Note, on the DWARF side it has been agreed to get rid of the requirement th=
at
uleb128/sleb128 has to be minimum possible length and I think all consumers
known  to me will not mind non-minimal leb128 as long as it isn't padded too
much (i.e. fits within 10 bytes or so).  So, even heavy relaxations in the
assembler and the linker shouldn't prevent leb128 support, all one needs for
linker relaxations is ULEB128 and SLEB128 relocation that allows subtractio=
n of
two symbols.  But what do you do for non-LEB128 symbol subtractions?  Do you
have relocations for lab1 - lab2 if one has .quad lab1 - lab2 + 15 ?=