* [Bug target/91614] [10 regression][arm] gcc.target/arm/unaligned-memcpy-2.c FAIL since r274986
[not found] <bug-91614-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2020-03-25 21:04 ` law at redhat dot com
2020-03-25 21:16 ` bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: law at redhat dot com @ 2020-03-25 21:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91614
Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P2
CC| |law at redhat dot com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/91614] [10 regression][arm] gcc.target/arm/unaligned-memcpy-2.c FAIL since r274986
[not found] <bug-91614-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-03-25 21:04 ` [Bug target/91614] [10 regression][arm] gcc.target/arm/unaligned-memcpy-2.c FAIL since r274986 law at redhat dot com
@ 2020-03-25 21:16 ` bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de
2020-03-25 22:14 ` law at redhat dot com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de @ 2020-03-25 21:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91614
Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de
--- Comment #3 from Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de> ---
My attempt at fixing this failure
https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc-patches/2019-09/msg00370.html
I am not sure if it war rejected or just not reviewe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/91614] [10 regression][arm] gcc.target/arm/unaligned-memcpy-2.c FAIL since r274986
[not found] <bug-91614-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-03-25 21:04 ` [Bug target/91614] [10 regression][arm] gcc.target/arm/unaligned-memcpy-2.c FAIL since r274986 law at redhat dot com
2020-03-25 21:16 ` bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de
@ 2020-03-25 22:14 ` law at redhat dot com
2020-04-28 3:55 ` edlinger at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: law at redhat dot com @ 2020-03-25 22:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91614
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> ---
I think the ARM maintainers need to make a decision here.
Bernd, you might want to ping that last patch.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/91614] [10 regression][arm] gcc.target/arm/unaligned-memcpy-2.c FAIL since r274986
[not found] <bug-91614-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-03-25 22:14 ` law at redhat dot com
@ 2020-04-28 3:55 ` edlinger at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-07 11:56 ` [Bug target/91614] [10/11 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: edlinger at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-04-28 3:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91614
Bernd Edlinger <edlinger at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever confirmed|1 |0
Status|ASSIGNED |UNCONFIRMED
--- Comment #5 from Bernd Edlinger <edlinger at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I have no idea how to fix this,
and I am not even sure if it is a bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/91614] [10/11 regression][arm] gcc.target/arm/unaligned-memcpy-2.c FAIL since r274986
[not found] <bug-91614-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2020-04-28 3:55 ` edlinger at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-05-07 11:56 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-23 6:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-05-07 11:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91614
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.0 |10.2
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10.1 has been released.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/91614] [10/11 regression][arm] gcc.target/arm/unaligned-memcpy-2.c FAIL since r274986
[not found] <bug-91614-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2020-05-07 11:56 ` [Bug target/91614] [10/11 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-07-23 6:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-08 12:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-07-23 6:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91614
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.2 |10.3
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10.2 is released, adjusting target milestone.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/91614] [10/11 regression][arm] gcc.target/arm/unaligned-memcpy-2.c FAIL since r274986
[not found] <bug-91614-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2020-07-23 6:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-04-08 12:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 10:38 ` [Bug target/91614] [10/11/12/13 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:35 ` [Bug target/91614] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-04-08 12:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91614
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.3 |10.4
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10.3 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 10.4.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/91614] [10/11/12/13 regression][arm] gcc.target/arm/unaligned-memcpy-2.c FAIL since r274986
[not found] <bug-91614-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2021-04-08 12:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-06-28 10:38 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:35 ` [Bug target/91614] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-06-28 10:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91614
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.4 |10.5
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 10.5.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/91614] [11/12/13/14 regression][arm] gcc.target/arm/unaligned-memcpy-2.c FAIL since r274986
[not found] <bug-91614-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2022-06-28 10:38 ` [Bug target/91614] [10/11/12/13 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-07-07 10:35 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-07-07 10:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91614
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.5 |11.5
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10 branch is being closed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread