From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id AD720384A032; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 11:29:03 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AD720384A032 From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/91862] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2394 Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 11:29:03 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 9.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 11:29:03 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D91862 Tobias Burnus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #5) > With r11-6917, I do not get any failures for the testcases in this PR. [...] > z2.f90 works with 9.3.1, 10.2.1, and master. > Does anybody know when this was fixed? Close the PR, add a testcase? It fails here with gcc-9 (of Ubuntu) which was updated on 08 Aug 2020. Only glancing at the GCC 9 log files: I think the patch https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9db58db5b3986531475968dd383f13a3f925d7ae for PR 96100= and PR 96101 fixes the issue, but I did not do any regression testing.=