From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id BED1D3939C1E; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 12:39:54 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BED1D3939C1E
From: "pault at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/91862] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at
 fold-const.c:2394
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 12:39:54 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status assigned_to
Message-ID: <bug-91862-4-dVxNDdYsxk@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-91862-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-91862-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 12:39:54 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D91862

Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |REOPENED
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org      |pault at gcc dot gn=
u.org

--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #6)
> (In reply to anlauf from comment #5)
> > With r11-6917, I do not get any failures for the testcases in this PR.
> [...]
> > z2.f90 works with 9.3.1, 10.2.1, and master.
>=20
> > Does anybody know when this was fixed?  Close the PR, add a testcase?
>=20
> It fails here with gcc-9 (of Ubuntu) which was updated on 08 Aug 2020. On=
ly
> glancing at the GCC 9 log files:
>=20
> I think the patch
> https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9db58db5b3986531475968dd383f13a3f925d7ae for PR 961=
00
> and PR 96101 fixes the issue, but I did not do any regression testing.

The patch for PRs 96100/101 was backported to 9-branch on 28th December.

Both testcases run fine with 9-branch now. They even give the intended resu=
lt
:-)

Before closing, I will add a testcase to master. I have taken the PR and
reopened it.

Cheers

Paul=