From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id E9867386F41B; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 22:09:08 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E9867386F41B DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1587420548; bh=VSLUgxkIttTu7p1QxBLYXJ64el4IGwV67Vtk4qjdpzA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=uYMzFXCzxNNHaTiNL3cGRWKV8Dwh/nKLB99qAaHOcvZd0abzaHC880IOyAUAjoUGe p++ZWEEbDsln/a1wCUUhOAH9TZygZ1T2UHliBQPu7BJWkcphhi6srze2dw2OM8b5/U 52yTSOJSmlQebEbDFGCVNJTiGW4c1guREJS1Nkds= From: "joseph at codesourcery dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/91970] arm: 64bit int to double conversion does not respect rounding mode Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 22:09:08 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: joseph at codesourcery dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 22:09:09 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D91970 --- Comment #13 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- bpabi-lib.h is the existing mechanism for renaming libgcc2.c functions and= =20 declaring them with __attribute__((pcs("aapcs"))). (But when causing more= =20 such functions to be used, or such functions to be used when they weren't=20 before, we'd need to make sure all the declarations therein are being=20 applied properly in the new cases to give the functions the desired ABI.)=