From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 877C2385B83B; Tue,  5 Oct 2021 21:05:02 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 877C2385B83B
From: "ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/92010] [8/9 Regression] gcc internal error since 8x on
 warning write-strings
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2021 21:05:02 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 8.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-92010-4-td9Aolk3Dl@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-92010-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-92010-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2021 21:05:02 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D92010

--- Comment #14 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to qingzhe huang from comment #13)
> (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #12)
> > (In reply to qingzhe huang from comment #11)
> > > The testcase g++.dg/cpp2a/lambda-uneval11.C still suffers a segment f=
ault if
> > > run by compiler cc1plus with latest code.
> >=20
> > Hmm, I can't reproduce that on latest trunk.  Is your working tree clea=
n?
>=20
> I tested in both 10.2.x and 11.2.x and even latest 12.x with yesterday pu=
ll.
> It won't show anything when compiling with driver, i.e. g++, but if you r=
un
> "cc1plus", it will crash. For example,
> ${GCC_INSTALL}/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/11.2.0/cc1plus
> -std=3Dc++20 ./lambda-uneval11.C
>=20
> Thank you

Ah yeah, I can reproduce the crash when invoking cc1plus directly and also =
when
passing -Q to the driver.  Might be better to open a separate PR for this a=
s it
seems to be a latent bug.=