From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id CF9C639DC4F1; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 22:54:11 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org CF9C639DC4F1
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1584053651;
 bh=6DGaelJ44Uipdt2UOJwo6TjnNcYzUI7QaYH9MlPZYzg=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=LVG+pFU7R0WzoTFjLSvO0+1YbsNplQ9y2JrfD08qzHxIlgRlX/foPh1N4hoFfWHFu
 rRWRoRdcgjDVYDdW9l+k2xA3SKxP1DZfUE/GD4vTcMzHZfP0gTylJjckg+DxQVQub/
 otN87N7AM3/zxdsNjTEWvhV+A+K14aw6I2stRl6Q=
From: "ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/92010] [8/9/10 Regression] gcc internal error since 8x on
 warning write-strings
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 22:54:11 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 8.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-92010-4-vfhqx4pNo5@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-92010-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-92010-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 22:54:11 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D92010

--- Comment #5 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The ICE seems to be revealing a latent issue:  In the following example (wh=
ich
GCC accepts), according to the static_assert labelled (1), the type of t is
const int*, but according to the static_assert labelled (2), the type of t =
is
int *const.



template <typename T>
void foo(const T t)
{
  static_assert(__is_same(decltype(t), const int*));  // (1)
}

static_assert(__is_same(decltype(foo<int[]>), void(int *)));  // (2)

int
main()
{
  foo<int[]>(nullptr);
}=