From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 238273AAC028; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 08:06:02 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 238273AAC028
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1584605162;
 bh=/gQ67s3aN/v5xdAYmsOCn30cczWDSwryIBvzq0ml1i4=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=qUB0Jb+W6vONniQAfHfjDmNApCvQLejcNaZ5gMvbWeK3vBMh+tRBCKOrJqcy3piK8
 phlWeyRPSV2NS/EWlJn/gHNtdzJmc2WhwqRU/zsHyonKExb1jeRptcsN9iIDdKIZ8u
 73n65udnz8Uh5lm8B6NyBGnpYLo/T1M94AYO0kJE=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/92264] [10 Regression] Compile time hog in
 521.wrf_r with -Ofast -march=znver2 -g since r276318
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 08:06:01 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: compile-time-hog
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-92264-4-gDiGPgzC0Y@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-92264-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-92264-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 08:06:02 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D92264

--- Comment #18 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Note also that param_max_find_base_term_values limits recursion depth but n=
ot
width (the loc list traversals).  The original visited_vals thing was to
prevent infinite recursion only.  If the global caching works a safer appro=
ach
would be to turn that visited_vals things into a local cache and see if tha=
t's
enough as well.=