From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 4E37E3887016; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 20:49:21 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4E37E3887016
From: "rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/92294] alias attribute generates incorrect code
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 20:49:21 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.4
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_file_loc
Message-ID: <bug-92294-4-38UXcyAHLV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-92294-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-92294-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 20:49:21 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D92294

rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                URL|                            |https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
                   |                            |il/gcc-patches/2020-Februar
                   |                            |y/539763.html

--- Comment #9 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.or=
g> ---
Oops, I never linked the patch, it's:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-February/539763.html
(following on from an earlier discussion in January).

Reading the thread back now, the reception wasn't as negative
as I'd remembered.  I'd been vaguely hoping to find time to try
removing find_base_term & co. for GCC 11, but that obviously
never happened.  (Turns out that writing new code is more fun. ;-))

Maybe we could consider going for the linked patch for GCC 11.=