From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 8AF993857020; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 07:21:53 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8AF993857020 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1596007313; bh=Cf8b1GbbEUuSHrulDmbPSAOustUwZEktxOhDidIDo0A=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=GpfCZDzM3+Jy0GdKVHL39qno7V7FJZE5T230/E3FqIjJRDWhvCJ1yBsg7bcUhDD0Z GG61CyGRnSmWHYHv+twmwFWr4JqujsMKgjQHbB0k/dC1PWkPPJXciNBRa+a3nJeynv wttx0F/KKu6cfpks4fIckMPGzNwyzRvkJ7V8Ezlo= From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug other/92396] -ftime-trace support Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 07:21:53 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: other X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 07:21:53 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D92396 Martin Li=C5=A1ka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc d= ot gnu.org --- Comment #7 from Martin Li=C5=A1ka --- Thank you Alexander for the pointer. I've just read the article and I must confirm that compiler uses demand for something that we can't currently sup= port easily. I'm leaving that unassigned.=