public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/92407] Destruction of objects returned from functions skipped by goto
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 17:41:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-92407-4-EWIt8E4nEB@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-92407-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92407

--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
<jason@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:32bd8a1053d25cbb15172294e59a81bc134658aa

commit r11-11162-g32bd8a1053d25cbb15172294e59a81bc134658aa
Author: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Date:   Sun Jun 4 12:00:55 2023 -0400

    c++: NRV and goto [PR92407]

    Here our named return value optimization was breaking the required
    destructor when the goto takes 'a' out of scope.  A simple fix for the
    release branches is to disable the optimization in the presence of backward
    goto.

    We could do better by disabling the optimization only if there is a
backward
    goto across the variable declaration, but we don't track that, and in GCC
14
    we instead make the goto work with NRV.

            PR c++/92407

    gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

            * cp-tree.h (struct language_function): Add backward_goto.
            * decl.c (check_goto): Set it.
            * typeck.c (check_return_expr): Prevent NRV if set.

    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

            * g++.dg/opt/nrv22.C: New test.

    (cherry picked from commit a645347c19b07cc7abd7bf276c6769fc41afc932)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-12-20 17:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-92407-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-11-16 16:13 ` sichert at in dot tum.de
2023-06-06  1:51 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-07  1:33 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-07  1:33 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-07  1:35 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-08-31 22:40 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-20 17:41 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2023-12-20 17:46 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-24 19:40 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-05 18:20 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-92407-4-EWIt8E4nEB@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).