From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id DFF143858C60; Sat, 22 Jan 2022 21:27:28 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DFF143858C60
From: "egallager at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/92479] missing warnings for unreachable codes with break
 (i.e. revive the subset of -Wunreachable-code that fits under clang's
 -Wunreachable-code-break)
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2022 21:27:28 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-92479-4-OQ6L6yollD@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-92479-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-92479-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2022 21:27:29 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D92479

--- Comment #14 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #12)
> Interestingly, both gcc and clang have nothing to say about this code:
>=20
> extern void g( int);
>=20
> void f( int a)
> {
> 	if (a >=3D 0)
> 	{
> 		if (a < 0)
> 		{
> 			g(a);
> 		}
> 	}
> }
>=20
> $ /home/dcb/gcc/results/bin/gcc -c -g -O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wunreachable-code
> jan20e.cc
> $
>=20
> cppcheck finds the problem:
>=20
> $ cppcheck --enable=3Dall jan20e.cc
> Checking jan20e.cc ...
> jan20e.cc:10:9: warning: Opposite inner 'if' condition leads to a dead co=
de
> block. [oppositeInnerCondition]
>   if (a < 0)
>         ^
> jan20e.cc:8:8: note: outer condition: a>=3D0
>  if (a >=3D 0)
>        ^

That's bug 82100, which is already linked under "See Also"=