public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/92535] [10/11 regression] ICF is relatively expensive and became less effective
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 18:10:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-92535-4-FytcbTv7J5@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-92535-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92535
--- Comment #15 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Current mainline with
1) fix to COMPONENT_REFs described above
2) improvement of ODR type having for THIS pointers
3) gimple_clobber fix (already approved)
4) compare_ao_refs fix for volatile accesses
5) compare_decs change so it does not test type compatibility of automatic
vars (since these types have little meaning)
1 false returned: '' in compare_decl at ../../gcc/ipa-icf-gimple.c:163
1 false returned: 'replaceable operator flags
are different' in compare_referenced_symbol_properties at
../../gcc/ipa-icf.c:359
4 false returned: '' in compare_bb at ../../gcc/ipa-icf-gimple.c:606
7 false returned: 'Mismatched number of parameters'
in equals_wpa at ../../gcc/ipa-icf.c:651
9 false returned: '' in
compare_variable_decl at ../../gcc/ipa-icf-gimple.c:447
9 false returned: '' in operand_equal_p at ../../gcc/ipa-icf-gimple.c:312
10 false returned: 'INTEGER_CST precision mismatch'
in equals at ../../gcc/ipa-icf.c:1807
11 false returned: 'case
low values are different' in compare_gimple_switch at
../../gcc/ipa-icf-gimple.c:808
23 false returned: '' in operand_equal_p at
../../gcc/ipa-icf-gimple.c:303
23 false
returned: 'one type is not polymorphic' in compatible_polymorphic_types_p at
../../gcc/ipa-icf-gimple.c:208
23 false returned: 'THIS pointer ODR type mismatch' in
equals_wpa at ../../gcc/ipa-icf.c:678
29 false returned: 'ASM
strings are different' in compare_gimple_asm at ../../gcc/ipa-icf-gimple.c:909
46 false returned: 'GIMPLE call operands are different' in
compare_gimple_call at ../../gcc/ipa-icf-gimple.c:681
141 false returned: 'Declaration mismatch' in equals at
../../gcc/ipa-icf.c:1803
169 false returned: '' in compare_decl at ../../gcc/ipa-icf-gimple.c:175
182 false returned: 'DECL_CXX_DESTRUCTOR mismatch' in equals_wpa at
../../gcc/ipa-icf.c:565
246 false returned: 'final flag mismatch' in
compare_referenced_symbol_properties at ../../gcc/ipa-icf.c:401
391 false returned: '' in compare_phi_node at ../../gcc/ipa-icf.c:1581
391 false returned: 'PHI node comparison returns false' in equals_private
at ../../gcc/ipa-icf.c:922
571 false returned: 'compare_ao_refs failed (dependence clique
difference)' in compare_operand at ../../gcc/ipa-icf-gimple.c:373
676 false returned: 'compare_ao_refs failed (semantic difference)' in
compare_operand at ../../gcc/ipa-icf-gimple.c:361
676 false returned: 'METHOD_TYPE and FUNCTION_TYPE mismatch' in
equals_wpa at ../../gcc/ipa-icf.c:674
707 false returned: 'operand_equal_p failed' in compare_operand at
../../gcc/ipa-icf-gimple.c:381
957 false returned: 'different references' in compare_symbol_references
at ../../gcc/ipa-icf.c:465
961 false returned: 'size mismatch' in equals_wpa at
../../gcc/ipa-icf.c:1652
1125 false returned: 'variables types are different' in equals at
../../gcc/ipa-icf.c:1698
1171 false returned: 'DECL_CXX_CONSTRUCTOR mismatch' in equals_wpa at
../../gcc/ipa-icf.c:562
1321 false returned: 'GIMPLE assignment operands are different' in
compare_gimple_assign at ../../gcc/ipa-icf-gimple.c:724
2209 false returned: 'different decl attributes' in equals_wpa at
../../gcc/ipa-icf.c:663
4643 false returned: 'GIMPLE LHS type mismatch' in compare_gimple_assign
at ../../gcc/ipa-icf-gimple.c:720
8400 false returned: 'parameter type is not compatible' in
compatible_parm_types_p at ../../gcc/ipa-icf.c:512
10187 false returned: 'inline attributes are different' in
compare_referenced_symbol_properties at ../../gcc/ipa-icf.c:350
16210 false returned: 'parameter types are not compatible' in equals_wpa at
../../gcc/ipa-icf.c:640
26071 false returned: 'references to virtual tables cannot be merged' in
compare_referenced_symbol_properties at ../../gcc/ipa-icf.c:373
28810 false returned: 'decl_or_type flags are different' in equals_wpa at
../../gcc/ipa-icf.c:572
32971 false returned: 'different tree types' in compatible_types_p at
../../gcc/ipa-icf-gimple.c:219
61665 false returned: 'call function types are not compatible' in
compare_gimple_call at ../../gcc/ipa-icf-gimple.c:660
96652 false returned: '' in equals_private at ../../gcc/ipa-icf.c:887
101194 false returned: 'types are not compatible' in compatible_types_p at
../../gcc/ipa-icf-gimple.c:225
119996 false returned: 'result types are different' in equals_wpa at
../../gcc/ipa-icf.c:622
many of call function types are not compatible are indirect calls with
mismatched number of parameters. This is because we hash SSA_NAME as nothing.
That is easy to fix.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-19 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-92535-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-05-07 11:56 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-23 6:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-17 19:49 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-17 20:03 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-17 20:05 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-17 20:21 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-17 21:37 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-18 7:33 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-18 8:26 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-19 13:57 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-19 18:10 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2021-04-08 12:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-15 9:38 ` [Bug ipa/92535] [10 " hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-04 12:31 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 10:38 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 8:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-92535-4-FytcbTv7J5@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).