From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 66711385DC03; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 08:45:56 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 66711385DC03 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1585730756; bh=m/hd8cp/8brz713XatTZUfzpqFdfBSxxDlu3gz1FceA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=BnuQ3Puuc5kX1qltDlPMhjBhHzdX2fYLbP6fJjlLxj1wAJP9sIgpP20Q/Ji3Fr5TE 4vE035oydPnBRamgTV73cTQCidEKbRnKopWgPdxN26lhvH8M9C6Sr1wTzjOer/mK20 EgZ2pbwONimCe164+sqcKjpj0jo2VG3HsXCBpmcw= From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/92546] [10 Regression] Large increase in preprocessed file sizes in C++2a mode Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 08:45:56 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 08:45:56 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D92546 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- Yes this is just a nice-to-have, not critical. I already made some big improvements, but then some new features made the s= izes jump up again. I'll take another look for low-hanging fruit, but if it does= n't happen for 10.1 it's not a big deal.=