public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/92643] ISO_Fortran_binding_15.f90 failure on i586-*-freebsd
[not found] <bug-92643-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2020-07-20 10:20 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2020-07-20 15:58 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2020-07-20 10:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92643
Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed| |2020-07-20
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> Should be fixed already by r10-6344-g2595f25cdaf4f16d04a1078a487b2ecc126cae29
Is it?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/92643] ISO_Fortran_binding_15.f90 failure on i586-*-freebsd
[not found] <bug-92643-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-07-20 10:20 ` [Bug fortran/92643] ISO_Fortran_binding_15.f90 failure on i586-*-freebsd dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2020-07-20 15:58 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-20 16:38 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-07-20 15:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92643
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #9 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #8)
> > Should be fixed already by r10-6344-g2595f25cdaf4f16d04a1078a487b2ecc126cae29
>
> Is it?
As of svn reversion 280157, the issue is not fixed.
mobile:kargl[202] cd gcc/obj/gcc/
mobile:kargl[203] gmake check-fortran RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=ISO_\*"
...
Running /usr/home/kargl/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/dg.exp ...
FAIL: gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_15.f90 -O0 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_15.f90 -O1 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_15.f90 -O2 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_15.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_15.f90 -O3 -g execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_15.f90 -Os execution test
=== gfortran Summary ===
# of expected passes 194
# of unexpected failures 6
/usr/home/kargl/gcc/obj/gcc/gfortran version 10.0.0 20200111 (experimental)
(GC
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/92643] ISO_Fortran_binding_15.f90 failure on i586-*-freebsd
[not found] <bug-92643-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-07-20 10:20 ` [Bug fortran/92643] ISO_Fortran_binding_15.f90 failure on i586-*-freebsd dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2020-07-20 15:58 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-07-20 16:38 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2020-07-20 16:59 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2020-07-20 16:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92643
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> As of svn reversion r280157, the issue is not fixed.
Do you know the git equivalent?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/92643] ISO_Fortran_binding_15.f90 failure on i586-*-freebsd
[not found] <bug-92643-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-07-20 16:38 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2020-07-20 16:59 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-20 23:51 ` jvdelisle at charter dot net
2020-07-21 0:20 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-07-20 16:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92643
--- Comment #11 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #10)
> > As of svn reversion r280157, the issue is not fixed.
>
> Do you know the git equivalent?
No. I don't use git. r280157 is the last svn revision before
it was turned into a read-only archive.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/92643] ISO_Fortran_binding_15.f90 failure on i586-*-freebsd
[not found] <bug-92643-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2020-07-20 16:59 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-07-20 23:51 ` jvdelisle at charter dot net
2020-07-21 0:20 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at charter dot net @ 2020-07-20 23:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92643
jvdelisle at charter dot net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jvdelisle at charter dot net
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at charter dot net ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #11)
> (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #10)
> > > As of svn reversion r280157, the issue is not fixed.
> >
> > Do you know the git equivalent?
>
> No. I don't use git. r280157 is the last svn revision before
> it was turned into a read-only archive.
Boost my memory, is that 32 bit platform?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/92643] ISO_Fortran_binding_15.f90 failure on i586-*-freebsd
[not found] <bug-92643-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2020-07-20 23:51 ` jvdelisle at charter dot net
@ 2020-07-21 0:20 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-07-21 0:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92643
--- Comment #13 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to jvdelisle from comment #12)
> (In reply to kargl from comment #11)
> > (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #10)
> > > > As of svn reversion r280157, the issue is not fixed.
> > >
> > > Do you know the git equivalent?
> >
> > No. I don't use git. r280157 is the last svn revision before
> > it was turned into a read-only archive.
>
> Boost my memory, is that 32 bit platform?
32-bit i586 architecture. I configure with --enable-checking=yes.
Don't know if that matters.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-07-21 0:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-92643-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-07-20 10:20 ` [Bug fortran/92643] ISO_Fortran_binding_15.f90 failure on i586-*-freebsd dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2020-07-20 15:58 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-20 16:38 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2020-07-20 16:59 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-20 23:51 ` jvdelisle at charter dot net
2020-07-21 0:20 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).