From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 131A63851C39; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 15:58:34 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 131A63851C39 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1595260714; bh=65Ly1YZvkC1HT8CJfkvffGzig9dG7+370iYGjl4e7QY=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=eWhwpEeRhp5lasI3WOhYK929KVMAGdBSC/7hsiEsxbNuxXNu+3J2pYKwqSSAujfeZ SRQZkLHDIAIeyd/5Sy7o4FT6SiffeoShh+Qggp9BpShneSIi7Li2owmEcDuj1l9G+r KwwI69nFHQdVicjL/djOANI6196XaeRj+WWtgEUo= From: "kargl at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/92643] ISO_Fortran_binding_15.f90 failure on i586-*-freebsd Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 15:58:33 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 15:58:34 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D92643 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #9 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #8) > > Should be fixed already by r10-6344-g2595f25cdaf4f16d04a1078a487b2ecc12= 6cae29 >=20 > Is it? As of svn reversion 280157, the issue is not fixed. mobile:kargl[202] cd gcc/obj/gcc/ mobile:kargl[203] gmake check-fortran RUNTESTFLAGS=3D"dg.exp=3DISO_\*" ... Running /usr/home/kargl/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/dg.exp ... FAIL: gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_15.f90 -O0 execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_15.f90 -O1 execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_15.f90 -O2 execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_15.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_15.f90 -O3 -g execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_15.f90 -Os execution test =3D=3D=3D gfortran Summary =3D=3D=3D # of expected passes 194 # of unexpected failures 6 /usr/home/kargl/gcc/obj/gcc/gfortran version 10.0.0 20200111 (experimental) (GC=