From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id CB35D395BC7C; Wed,  2 Dec 2020 13:24:36 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org CB35D395BC7C
From: "glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/92729] [avr] Convert the backend to MODE_CC so it can be
 kept in future releases
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 13:24:36 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-92729-4-5hPPIKxRqD@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-92729-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-92729-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 13:24:36 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D92729

--- Comment #31 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz at physik dot fu-b=
erlin.de> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #30)
> I don't think that's true, is it? I think Senthil Kumar needs to complete
> the paperwork with the FSF for the patches to be "available to the projec=
t".
> Tht can be done by assigning copyright to the FSF or completing a disclai=
mer
> to place the work in the public domain.

The question will also be who will get to claim the bounty? If everyone
contributes something, it will be more difficult to determine who gets what=
.=