public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "abebeos at lazaridis dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/92729] [avr] Convert the backend to MODE_CC so it can be kept in future releases
Date: Sat, 01 May 2021 13:40:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-92729-4-xxjLvsSRkK@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-92729-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92729

--- Comment #54 from abebeos at lazaridis dot com ---
Bounty Claim:

Please not that "saaadhu"s patch was "shelved". I integrated a validation-setup
and tested several existent solutions, and identified during the "reuse
existent work" phase of my work "saaadhus" patch as the best one of two patches
(pipcet beeing the other one):

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92729#c35

saaadhu continued the work at some point.

My overall effort is described in summary here:

https://github.com/abebeos/avr-gnu/blob/master/doc/README.md

The test-setup which led to the validation of saaadhu result is here:

https://github.com/abebeos/avr-gnu

Now, there is a strange tendency within this project to completely ignore my
work on this issue/bounty and my person, see e.g. here:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92729#c45

Very sad, the very very basic rule of "correct attribution" (within OSS and
academia) seems to be non-existent. Not to talk about the behavior agains
"worker" (because I'm a simple worker in the context here, working to get some
income).

Additionally, saaadhu never replied to private email, even not to the last one:

"
Hi there!

It looks like bountysource has no functionality to split bounties, so we would
need to agree to a way of processing the split.

Are you ok with splitting the bounty 50/50?

One possible process:

- We tell the backers that we agreed
- I claim the bounty
- I get the amount granted on bountysource (this can take up to 2 weeks,
because of the veto period and the many backers),
- I file a bounty with 50% of the amount (around $3000) which you can claim
nearly immediately. This way we avoid the payout delays (sometimes a week or
more until money arrives on paypal), and all backers can see within a day that
we've done the split.

Please let me know if you have another suggestion.
"
correction: around $3500

-

The flow within this ticket here shows clearly that i contributed
significantly(!) to the fulfillment of this bounty, having invested multiple
weeks.

Backers may choose to ignore that fact.

Or the may not.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-01 13:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-92729-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-05-22  4:53 ` f.mach4 at gmail dot com
2020-05-22  6:26 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2020-05-22  8:44 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-29 23:16 ` pipcet at gmail dot com
2020-08-04 16:54 ` pipcet at gmail dot com
2020-08-06 22:40 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2020-10-09 15:54 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-10 16:38 ` abebeos at lazaridis dot com
2020-11-10 16:45 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2020-11-11 13:57 ` abebeos at lazaridis dot com
2020-11-14 20:23 ` gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-15 13:27 ` gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-15 14:13 ` abebeos at lazaridis dot com
2020-11-15 17:39 ` gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-18 20:08 ` abebeos at lazaridis dot com
2020-11-29  0:10 ` abebeos at lazaridis dot com
2020-11-29  9:18 ` pipcet at gmail dot com
2020-11-29 10:54 ` abebeos at lazaridis dot com
2020-11-30 13:48 ` abebeos at lazaridis dot com
2020-11-30 13:54 ` saaadhu at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-30 13:57 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2020-11-30 14:14 ` abebeos at lazaridis dot com
2020-11-30 14:15 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-30 14:47 ` abebeos at lazaridis dot com
2020-11-30 16:29 ` abebeos at lazaridis dot com
2020-11-30 23:25 ` abebeos at lazaridis dot com
2020-12-01 19:10 ` abebeos at lazaridis dot com
2020-12-02 13:03 ` abebeos at lazaridis dot com
2020-12-02 13:22 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-12-02 13:24 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2020-12-02 13:56 ` abebeos at lazaridis dot com
2020-12-02 14:04 ` abebeos at lazaridis dot com
2020-12-03  0:37 ` abebeos at lazaridis dot com
2020-12-04  1:19 ` abebeos at lazaridis dot com
2020-12-04 19:31 ` abebeos at lazaridis dot com
2020-12-07  0:39 ` abebeos at lazaridis dot com
2020-12-07 13:02 ` abebeos at lazaridis dot com
2020-12-07 13:10 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2020-12-07 13:34 ` abebeos at lazaridis dot com
2020-12-09 13:42 ` abebeos at lazaridis dot com
2020-12-10 14:38 ` abebeos at lazaridis dot com
2020-12-12 18:24 ` abebeos at lazaridis dot com
2020-12-13 16:13 ` abebeos at lazaridis dot com
2020-12-13 22:06 ` abebeos at lazaridis dot com
2020-12-14  2:12 ` abebeos at lazaridis dot com
2020-12-16 20:46 ` abebeos at lazaridis dot com
2021-02-06 15:21 ` saaadhu at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-30 17:21 ` saaadhu at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-30 18:16 ` abebeos at lazaridis dot com
2021-04-30 18:29 ` abebeos at lazaridis dot com
2021-04-30 18:33 ` abebeos at lazaridis dot com
2021-05-01 12:40 ` shiftee at posteo dot net
2021-05-01 13:40 ` abebeos at lazaridis dot com [this message]
2021-05-01 13:42 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2021-05-01 13:52 ` abebeos at lazaridis dot com
2021-05-02 20:47 ` abebeos at lazaridis dot com
2021-05-07 23:27 ` abebeos at lazaridis dot com
2021-05-09 21:55 ` abebeos at lazaridis dot com
2021-05-12 18:34 ` abebeos at lazaridis dot com
2021-05-13 21:19 ` abebeos at lazaridis dot com
2023-06-10 19:59 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-10 20:25 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-10 20:46 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-03 12:10 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-92729-4-xxjLvsSRkK@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).