From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id C85F9385DC00; Sat, 4 Apr 2020 06:02:55 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C85F9385DC00 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1585980175; bh=SVCYLP8iQ0h/Mbz6ZHZEE9swnmbIYZfUzCGOG+Afn8M=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=UWpYsi3RZnXLMuwJrYjUb4kfrnxh+9K5ZewKAJAj5Dwhh+RVU0M3I+Vrcdmhy9zEO xnspGuIbhC7OCd6cw9L3xQX8O5fcPMkQF0/8+gSj1q2kYv6uM/MUgmmpRIsfQlGhbH m+yAxCj8Vafq5KngO38th3MlgN+sZs6n5eG72xdU= From: "xerofoify at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ipa/92981] ICE in get_partitioning_class, at symtab.c:1966 Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2020 06:02:55 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-checking, ice-on-invalid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: xerofoify at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2020 06:02:55 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D92981 Nicholas Krause changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xerofoify at gmail dot com --- Comment #2 from Nicholas Krause --- After looking through this with a debugger this seems odd to me: if (alias && definition && !ultimate_alias_target ()->definition) I'm not sure but after looking through it this seems to assume definition a= nd alias would be pointing be true which does not seem to be the case with th= is code and thus asserts here: gcc_checking_assert (vnode->definition); Seems this commit id,d3f2e41ea introduced it. Jan Hubicka are we certain that definition and alias must both be true here as that does not appear=20 to be the case for returning SYMBOL_EXTERNAL?=