From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id B10FA3858C36; Sat,  5 Nov 2022 07:42:20 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B10FA3858C36
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1667634140;
	bh=+xYyWQkZq+JzWLefFvEPEoom6PKA/nrqzN1Ru46Nf5M=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Adfnwg3m57+5r+U1M15ijLZN0S8K6RATBF9FjUb9u4pJs1Eq/q+UDGHk8/2zxZzVJ
	 qeXiPcLoCw1w6V2Bf4KNQ4DNmn47VjU89ZgEz8CFzFQWWLY4729nlBbtTiG1A2nubi
	 W6POLwm9dlF/0JXu7GdFdWx8Z8gFQ56cO1fCyHb8=
From: "ramana at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/92999] [armhf] struct with adjacent __fp16's copies
 wrongly
Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2022 07:42:19 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.3.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ABI, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc everconfirmed cf_known_to_fail
 cf_reconfirmed_on
Message-ID: <bug-92999-4-7SRG4t1b94@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-92999-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-92999-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D92999

Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
                 CC|                            |ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
      Known to fail|                            |13.0
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2022-11-05

--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
confirmed on trunk.

I think this is an issue in the way the registers are allocated for the VFP
PCS.=