From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 937CA3844754; Sat,  4 May 2024 23:16:27 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 937CA3844754
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1714864587;
	bh=PSXcjDAlJAHviwtmGhEv/JYgYcKdOnLxYmw8MOaTcac=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Oa7U9FfpR84ekfk4sz8IpPze/H4rvzW+IHdccJ/u5ePvSoYY5XrXAm0HgQftzWAxA
	 orfgo4oUwfh+H0rN+oeHgllURptDjp/0/t+iyXWfefQRqEGzI+XsMHNbgObFYbNkg+
	 YVAAq2QCWhcKXAZqjMc7VrUdq2KxB5WznA8HB7d4=
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/93008] Need a way to make inlining heuristics ignore
 whether a function is inline
Date: Sat, 04 May 2024 23:16:26 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-93008-4-cr5KU0PQf2@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-93008-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-93008-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D93008

--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
There's nothing fake about them, they are definitely inline functions as fa=
r as
the language rules. But in some cases we don't want the compiler to use that
fact as an optimisation hint.=