From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 6131738449C8; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 08:31:47 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6131738449C8
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1713774708;
	bh=KoBDIRpmKwFpeH/FF3IKEVWDwk1BNRI07tVKorbO23I=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Zws3wuhY2h3nGIvReGYh2nCBFD6wDXWagFGRdexvTy/l1IHGbSKRAQtNOm0od2l4Y
	 kNdq9QFJ1CY/GNkXtnw6wpmtIQrBRL4hYN5DuiKuSqUE3RSpM6W2Sv55Pn7W8vTqV8
	 XN+oqzCM8hpYRx99ePUOoAy80mBsu6K/vfPY77EQ=
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/93008] Need a way to make inlining heuristics ignore
 whether a function is inline
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 08:31:37 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-93008-4-yRrOynFrnc@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-93008-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-93008-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D93008

--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Another solution is just to use __builtin_expect or [[likely]] or [[unlikel=
y]]
at the call site. That wouldn't need any compiler changes.=