From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 15134385DC29; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 10:41:06 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 15134385DC29 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1586860866; bh=tYtDNXU94q8MFSX2hxFjPlLr8VmIROB5KpwOeJgeeZM=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=IbtTNpVkYtFYeSpgq1o20Hg3aGh77+LOX+Cvx7sg0G8JZjO0C3c3Wri8iA09iSuF9 3pWjYL052IY2LR+RL7McD3Qkcxzg6coaVjBflBlChkXUp9Q/n7arwiAbqCU19uS62R Ux9EmkiGcaYoS36NVkQ4j4uWFk459v1by97W4sHA= From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/93053] [10 Regression] libgcc build failure with old binutils on aarch64 Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 10:41:05 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 10:41:06 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D93053 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8) > I've tried manually: > --- cas_16_1.s~ 2020-04-14 12:19:03.000000000 +0200 > +++ cas_16_1.s 2020-04-14 12:20:10.083098672 +0200 > @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ > # 1 "" 2 > # 1 "/usr/src/gcc/libgcc/config/aarch64/lse.S" > # 53 "/usr/src/gcc/libgcc/config/aarch64/lse.S" > - .arch armv8-a+lse > + .arch armv8-a >=20=20 >=20=20 > .hidden __aarch64_have_lse_atomics > @@ -37,7 +37,8 @@ > STARTFN __aarch64_cas16_relax > JUMP_IF_NOT_LSE 8f > # 166 "/usr/src/gcc/libgcc/config/aarch64/lse.S" > - casp x0, x1, x2, x3, [x4] > +// casp x0, x1, x2, x3, [x4] > + .word 0x48207c82 > ret >=20=20 > 8: mov x16, x0 > which assembles (the constant taken from aarch64-linux-objdump -dr before > the changes), but for some reason when disassembled aarch64-linux-objdump > -dr knows that it was .word and not casp instruction. > Any way to emit insns not supported by the assembler? There is the .inst directive=