From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 2D75E385DC06; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 11:59:58 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2D75E385DC06
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1586865598;
 bh=uU+Wl2NP04FkdTsC4DtR+D4l7w1aVt9x+AVdV5aVq+Y=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=cLrfWEohtYq9PwArt/WNy6Ndx0YZMr/KBveNj5l5VPpP+UtkHqVtjvPRE46Kf9oxg
 DWZpHzStA7iXDwpMwIa4fBTZLdfZjYepu50tCLMJWdgdsYB4EVaHIg53SpmPgnV3ZV
 ZL3JbLiEMjAFHfz45N8FQS9+SfTvCNA4vB9O6bzg=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/93053] [10 Regression] libgcc build failure with old
 binutils on aarch64
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 11:59:57 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-93053-4-EHqztBub1n@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-93053-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-93053-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 11:59:58 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D93053

--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 48269
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D48269&action=3Dedit
gcc10-pr93053.patch

So how about this (tested just that when preprocessing + assembling with
-DHAVE_AS_LSE and without it generates the same object files in all cases, =
but
not actually with running configure with old or new gas)?

Note, as -moutline-atomics has been backported to 9.x, the regression is no=
w on
the 9 branch too (but P1 there too (and even more important, because there =
is
higher probability older gcc will be used with older binutils), because 9.3
didn't have that yet).=