From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id CB0953858D28; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 09:36:27 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org CB0953858D28
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1692696987;
	bh=B74c+sK5PVMbHN1+s443iYHnaOcv140npwRU/++8sMw=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=VvvaUfyMmWOV1A2cborAbnhUVshmUUKt0lo+tpKpQcX7I57hcILRir6g5gInZQDph
	 +U1P+cGPxZkKU3Yw7XNEhhEMy/Zh7GeEwZJxa2rTxsu8ZQeEx0Lh60tabOCM9Bh99K
	 WjUQAidOwAFaSFUc1GsgYbLDVFxqBzBZHKG3VGnE=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/93080] insert of an extraction on the same
 location is not optimized
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 09:36:27 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, TREE
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-93080-4-P3CJtcJp5Y@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-93080-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-93080-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D93080

--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The testcase in the description is fixed, comment#2 and comment#4 are not.=