From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 2DCA03851C05; Fri, 8 May 2020 13:01:09 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2DCA03851C05 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1588942869; bh=q5SK6Q9KQhuG1+irr1WcvF2UI8/4H5zPwhqSkb9Rsv4=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Npr2sXXBdN0thA5fCTv4/Z4J+lUZbouMhypgxc4CyBul2z3bc1N3V8c68edObExuH +Yw8ee3QIaf/r2iYmfM9ab5LTBfCjEpHe+uM/XdUEmE1OKtOxHPwvK7IaREW2CBcTJ fPpQBsTJO3TfE1LeS9PTdXtHsuzO43wioKhYy+4M= From: "ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/93103] Generic function syntax does not check return concept Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 13:01:08 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: accepts-invalid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution cc bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 13:01:09 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D93103 Patrick Palka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE CC| |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #1 from Patrick Palka --- Looks like this is a dup of PR92187, which should already be fixed in GCC 1= 0. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 92187 ***=