From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id DC0D03858CDB; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 09:27:50 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DC0D03858CDB
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1675070870;
	bh=q8D3TeIAUgDxDJNEYdGsXDgS1a2SMFq9ER/oGmsRhfs=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Yopx6qdI8gVDvRVf6iG6vNydyhjXAPWEFHqLvpuYWDjJ06MbbQr99YCt3DTf09IAN
	 RxVuYs60gitCPoS/Glgj9CKsZaZDaIYux9ZiUIJarx2tUkv+ijl69NhdbM7Cif2rHu
	 c4FnFOCMm1vzrUuyCPdcEvoFBlGtONcB5IB3Uc6E=
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/93106] [c++2a] Deleted move constructor is not selected
 when returning an automatic variable
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 09:27:50 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: accepts-invalid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-93106-4-0QXYJ9bjB5@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-93106-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-93106-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D93106

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |dev at gutoehrlein dot eu

--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 108594 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***=