* [Bug fortran/93256] Assumed-shape unlimited polymorphic variable passes values incorrectly
[not found] <bug-93256-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2022-04-21 16:53 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-21 17:24 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: mikael at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-04-21 16:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93256
Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC| |mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Can’t reproduce, it prints 10, 20, 30 in order.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/93256] Assumed-shape unlimited polymorphic variable passes values incorrectly
[not found] <bug-93256-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2022-04-21 16:53 ` [Bug fortran/93256] Assumed-shape unlimited polymorphic variable passes values incorrectly mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-04-21 17:24 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-22 8:51 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-04-21 17:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93256
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Works for 12.0., fails with 9.4.0.
So, I assume this has been fixed in the meantime, it would be interesting
to see when.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/93256] Assumed-shape unlimited polymorphic variable passes values incorrectly
[not found] <bug-93256-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2022-04-21 16:53 ` [Bug fortran/93256] Assumed-shape unlimited polymorphic variable passes values incorrectly mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-21 17:24 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-04-22 8:51 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-22 9:07 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-22 19:30 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-04-22 8:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93256
Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |NEW
Keywords| |needs-bisection, wrong-code
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Also works with gcc-Version 11.2.1 20220108 (GCC), so definitely
fixed.
Anybody up for bisecting this?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/93256] Assumed-shape unlimited polymorphic variable passes values incorrectly
[not found] <bug-93256-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2022-04-22 8:51 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-04-22 9:07 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-22 19:30 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-04-22 9:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93256
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
r10-6924-g7485ace81de9ec9dd5c87edf67e359d31ce35a20
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/93256] Assumed-shape unlimited polymorphic variable passes values incorrectly
[not found] <bug-93256-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2022-04-22 9:07 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-04-22 19:30 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-04-22 19:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93256
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Looks pretty much like a dup of pr92785.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 92785 ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread