From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 53D99385E02A; Thu,  2 Apr 2020 12:32:07 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 53D99385E02A
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1585830727;
 bh=GwHtCxUqad/6obZhMAS3QlwCvqeWKVW6ermd5k7q9VE=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=K2x12Q8tVTsGzA9f54Lh5RUyJTWUXpH7lWa1g0fxqlVOWgSOQmqgzYtDyUNGQd7jV
 8rVcmxhWWtAG5QbY3gjxzDkSB6qgKFvakc49OB6EJTfop9G1WfpotRZpKWChJfmL2p
 Zd1yULKTWA7vzaXpUiBog0fOyznExFu3tFT9ADx4=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/93264] [10 Regression] ICE in
 cfg_layout_redirect_edge_and_branch_force, at cfgrtl.c:4522
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2020 12:32:07 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-93264-4-I3XO7l7dIq@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-93264-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-93264-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2020 12:32:07 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D93264

--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Makes me wonder if hot/cold splitting should use a special jump instruction
for crossing jumps which we could fixup/split very late so we see

 (parallel
    (set reg (label_ref ..))
    (set pc (reg))
    (clobber reg))

or something like that.  That is, make sure the crossing jump, if
indirect, has the destination computation easily accessible and
replaceable.=