From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 19A8D385BF92; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 10:13:41 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 19A8D385BF92 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1585908821; bh=h0qi/8WOwvfSFjElDQGBQbSVzWxyT/PqhjwTTItsqLc=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=aldru3H45PKxOPXPDkXm2D6HYZqVGoJmPukYBxusXGRW3c/aeWDVUyXp0MImXne6Q t71lsJxAeM5tqawbsnP5vvw/UX1RGWTSgUiNa4hxsY0HHDOfCI+tYcYEqS7fjYOKby m+/fjyFK47B6RQNiKw8utyLeezHsNLP/QdCVqP/w= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/93264] [10 Regression] ICE in cfg_layout_redirect_edge_and_branch_force, at cfgrtl.c:4522 Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2020 10:13:40 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2020 10:13:41 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D93264 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek --- I bet even i386 shouldn't claim to support it if ix86_cmodel =3D=3D CM_LARG= E || ix86_cmodel =3D=3D CM_LARGE_PIC.=