From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id C1F22385803D; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 20:48:45 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C1F22385803D
From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/93353] ICE: in final_scan_insn_1, at final.c:3073
 (error: could not split insn)
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 20:48:45 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-93353-4-gyypYzMfJi@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-93353-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-93353-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 20:48:45 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D93353

--- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #5)
> (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #4)
> > I cannot get the reduced testcase to fail.  Are any special options nee=
ded?
>=20
> If you've been asking me:

Well you reported this, so probably?  :-)

> no, the compiler invocation posted in comment 0 is
> explicit, but maybe you need -m32 -f{,no-}PIC -f{,no-}stack-protector whi=
ch
> one often does for reproducing my PRs because of the configuration I use.

Maybe that is why I so often cannot reproduce your PRs?  Please always state
the
exact compiler configuration / invocation needed.

> I'll certainly test the current snapshot, but I won't be able to do so at
> least one more week.

Jakub in comment 7 seems to have found the problem.  I cc:ed Alan, who did
4c69e61f4307, which seems to have fixed it on trunk (there is no PR for that
so far?)=